The results of Cinebench and Intel tech demo are not enough? Today Intel presented the rendering performance of Nehalem.
Three Intel CPUs calculate identical videos: a
Nehalem/Bloomfield, a
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 (3.0 GHz) and an elderly
Pentium EE 955 (3.46 GHz). The clock speed of the Nehalem system is kept secret, but because talk is about "comparable frequencies” we suppose it is the 3.2 GHz model.
Intels
Nehalem beim Video-Rendering (Bild: PCGH) [Source: view picture gallery]
Intels
Kentsfield beim Video-Rendering (Bild: PCGH) [Source: view picture gallery]
Intels
Presler beim Video-Rendering (Bild: PCGH) [Source: view picture gallery]
The Nehalem rendered the video in 1:06 minutes, the
Kentsfiled in 1:45 minutes and it took the
Presler 7:28 minutes to do the job. Of course the video software benefits from multiple cores and
Hyper-Threading. An
SSE4.2 optimization is not included, yet.
By the way: The case you can see is an
Antec Nine Hundred.
more pictures 
Comment this story! (0 Comment)