Username:
Password:
Remember Me?
   Lost your password?
Search



Intel's Core 2 series in clock per clock comparison

Intel Core 2 Cache test: Seven CPUs reviewed

By now there are many different versions - even if clock speed and Stepping are not taken into account - of Intel's Core 2 series processors. PCGH compares most of the available models from Conroe to Wolfdale - with each CPU tested under the same conditions.


Does cache size matter?
 
Does cache size matter? [Source: view picture gallery]

Introduction
The variety of Intel's desktop CPUs became quite confusing over the years. Generally a CPU gets more powerful as the processor number - and with it clock speed and Cache size - is getting bigger, but some of the series have some secrets to offer nevertheless. Another question is, if you better take a cheaper CPU like the E7300 or a more expensive Core 2 from one of the earlier series. After all the brand-new 45 nm CPUs with the Wolfdale architecture had to endure several improvements like drastically accelerated division, support for SSE4.1 (with an appropriate BIOS) and other things.

PCGH checks it out and compares the seven CPUs of the Core 2 family listed below. They all have the same clock and Front Side Bus.

• Intel Celeron Dualcore E1400
• Intel Pentium Dualcore E2180
• Intel Core 2 Duo E4400
• Intel Pentium Dualcore E5200
• Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
• Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
• Intel Core 2 Duo E8600

We chose 2 gigahertz at 200 MHz FSB, so the CPUs have to support a multiplier of 10. Therefore the original Allendale series (E6300, E6400) didn't match our requirements because those CPUs only had lower multipliers.

Additional details about the processors can be found in the appropriate CPU-Z screenshots on the next pages.


--
Author: Carsten Spille (Oct 16, 2008)


You’re looking for more information related to AMD/ATI products like Phenom, Athlon and Radeon? Then please check our special AMD landing page with news, reviews and guides.




Advertisement

Comments (2)

Read all comments here!
Ar.Pi Re: Intel Core 2 Cache test: Seven CPUs reviewed
Senior Member
28.10.2008 16:00
Quote: (Originally Posted by jaredpace)
I love this benchmark, and many readers & gamers really appreciate your hard work and these results. Would have been great to see all the cpus overclocked at 3.0 & 3.5ghz and the E8xxx and E7xxx overclocked at 4.0 & 4.5ghz to compare with.

I'm looking forward to a HUGE CPU overclocking shoot-out from you guys. Quads, duals, and maybe I7 too!


I second that.

These reviews save a lot of unneeded hustle when overclocking
jaredpace Re: Intel Core 2 Cache test: Seven CPUs reviewed
Junior Member
22.10.2008 19:08
I love this benchmark, and many readers & gamers really appreciate your hard work and these results. Would have been great to see all the cpus overclocked at 3.0 & 3.5ghz and the E8xxx and E7xxx overclocked at 4.0 & 4.5ghz to compare with.

I'm looking forward to a HUGE CPU overclocking shoot-out from you guys. Quads, duals, and maybe I7 too!

Copyright © 2014 by Computec Media GmbH      About/Imprint  •  Terms/Conditions