Username:
Password:
Remember Me?
   Lost your password?
Search

Catalyst 8.12 vs. Geforce 180.48
Continuation: Radeon versus Geforce: Visual quality compared in nine games


Left 4 Dead: Geforce 178.24 vs. 180.48

Mouseout: Geforce 178.24 WHQL / Mouseover: Geforce 180.48 WHQL



Left 4 Dead: Catalyst 8.11 vs. 8.12

Mouseout: Catalyst 8.11 WHQL / Mouseover: Catalyst 8.12 WHQL



Left 4 Dead: Geforce180.48 vs. Catalyst 8.12

Mouseout: Geforce 180.48 WHQL / Mouseover: Catalyst 8.12 WHQL



Left 4 Dead: Geforce180.48 vs. Catalyst 8.12 (detail)


Achtung: Bildausschnitt!

Mouseout: Geforce 180.48 WHQL / Mouseover: Catalyst 8.12 WHQL

Picture gallery  (enlarge to view source)





--
Author: Marc Sauter (Dec 15, 2008)






Advertisement

Comments (5)

Comments 2 to 5  Read all comments here!
Acantee09 Radeon versus Geforce Visual quality compared in n...
Banned
26.12.2009 08:06
Nice to see this after I decided to grab a now 229 9550 at NewEgg and forgo the i7 upgrade for a while.

Now the question is, can I wait for the ATI Radeon 5900 architecture for a video card upgrade?
Ar.Pi Re: Radeon versus Geforce: Visual quality compared in nine games
Senior Member
17.12.2008 19:19
Like Alias said, great effort there.

There isn't much of a difference between Catalyst and Nforce. Catalyst (for me) looks a bit sharper on textures and Nforce a bit more blurry, but it's only really apparent in Crysis. But even then you have to look for it...
pcghx_Kristoffer Re: Radeon versus Geforce: Visual quality compared in nine games
Administrator
16.12.2008 10:32
Quote: (Originally Posted by Alias)
I can see a conclusion in the index and that too in the first page but no content on it. A conclusion please?


I fixed the headline. The Conclusion is the second part below the Introduction and above the test procedure.

If you still have any questions, just ask.

Copyright © 2014 by Computec Media GmbH      About/Imprint  •  Terms/Conditions