With two GT200b chips the Geforce GTX 295 is supposed to win the performance crown back from AMD's dual GPU card HD 4870 X2. In this preview PC Games Hardware tests with five game benchmarks if this venture is successful.
Geforce GTX 295 previewed at PC Games Hardware [Source: view picture gallery]
GPU-Z neither recognizes the correct number of transistors nor the Die size of the GTX 295 GPUs. [Source: view picture gallery]
PC Games Hardware is among the few testers who can already check the Geforce GTX 295 - Nvidia's new dual GPU card, based on two 55 nm GT200b chips. Furthermore it is the first Nvidia gaming card that exceeds the limit of one TFLOPS - due to two GPUs each of which has access to 240 Shader ALUs, 80 texture units and 28 ROPS with a 448 Bit memory interface.
The Geforce 295 GTX is supposed to reclaim the title of the fastest single graphics card for Nvidia, after AMD had scored unexpected success with the HD 4800 series and was able to deliver the up to now fastest single graphics card in form of the dual GPU model HD 4870 X2. We can't tell when the GTX 295 will become officially available at the moment, but we suppose a date around mid-January 2009. A price between 449 to 479 Euros could be realistic for the Nvidia card, but the final price will probably depend on the exchange rate of the dollar.
Our preview of the Geforce GTX 295 is subject to similar terms as our review of the HD 4870 X2. This means among other things:
- The sample provided by Nvidia is a pre-production device running with Beta drivers. Therefore we won't record loudness or power consumption (Nvidia specifies a TDP of 289 watts). - We check only up-to-date and poplar games like Fallout 3, Crysis Warhead, Far Cry 2, Call of Duty 5: World at War and Valve's Left 4 Dead (dt.) in the usual manner.
With the Geforce GTX 295 Nvidia finally introduces the first 55 nanometer product to the Enthusiast sector. The two GT200b chips are already produced in the finer structure and thus can be run with lower energy consumption. Nvidia specified the TDP with 289 watts. That is 3 watts higher than the nominal requirement of the Radeon HD 4870 X2, but much less than two combined GTX 260 cards need. And compared to the later ones the GTX 295 offers additional features. All the important details are listed in the chart below.
Geforce GTX 295 previewed at PC Games Hardware [Source: view picture gallery]
As it has been the case with the Geforce 9800 GX2, Nvidia uses a so called sandwich design for the GTX 295 (without the GX2 tag) Two PCBs with the two GPUs between them are cooled by a single cooling solution. Nvidia says this design has thermal benefits compared to AMD's tandem design. In contrast to the 9800 GX2 Nvidia uses bigger areas on the slot cover and the upper side of the card to exhaust the heated air from between the two PCBs of the GTX 295. The noise of the radial fan is rather unobtrusive and could be described as hissing; we couldn't hear drumming noises. If you are afraid of getting deaf because of the cooling, we can give an all clear even for our pre-production sample. From a subjective point of view we already had much louder cards in our Test Lab. At full workload the card is not - as expected - the appropriate choice for silent PCs, but in idle it is surprisingly quiet.
Comparison: theoretical specifications
Nvidia Geforce
AMD Radeon
9800 GTX+
8800 Ultra
GTX 260-216
GTX 280
GTX 295*
HD 4870 X2*
HD 4870
Chip
G92
G80
GT200
GT200
2xGT200b
2xRV770
RV770
Architecture (Nanometer)
65/55nm
90
65
65
55
55
55
Transistors (Mio.)
754
681
1,400
1,400
???
2x965
965
Core frequency (MHz)
738
612
576
602
576
750
750
Shader ALU frequency (MHz)
1,836
1,512
1,242
1,296
1,242
750
750
Memory frequency (MHz)
1,100
1,080
999
1,107
999
1,800
1,800
Shader version
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.1
Shader ALUs
128
128
216
240
2x240
2x800
800
VRAM (MiByte)
512
768
896
1,024
2x896
2x1,024
512
Memory bus (Bit)
256
384
448
512
2x448
2x256
256
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR3
GDDR3
GDDR3
GDDR3
GDDR5
GDDR5
MAD performance (GFLOP/s)
470
387,1
536,5
622,1
2x596,2
2x1,200
1,200
MAD+MUL/ADD performance (GFLOP/s)
705**
580.7**
804.8**
933.1**
2x894,2
2x1,200
1,200
Texture fillrate (MTex/s)
47,232
19,584
41,472
48,160
2x46,080
2x30,000
30,000
Memory bandwidth (MiByte/s)
70,400
103,680
111,888
141,696
2x111,888
2x115,200
115,200
Multi GPU
SLI, 3-W.-SLI
SLI
SLI
SLI, 3-W.-SLI
Q-SLI
Crossfire X
Crossfire X
PCI-E. power connector (6-Pin/8-Pin)
2x/0x
2x/0x
2x/0x
1x/1x
1x/1x
1x/1x
2x/0x
Two NVIO chips are working in the PCB sandwich of the GTX 295. According to Nvidia one is feeding the two Dual-Link DVI ports, while the other one is supplying data to the additional HDMI port. So up to three displays can be connected to the card.
crazy cpu bottlenecking going on there...meaning youll have to splash out on a new nehalem/mobo/ddr3 to take real advantage of this beast...still,nvidia have clearly regained the gpu crown. americans will no doubt have a decent reason to buy one(suggested retail is around 450-500 dollars i think)..but 500 euros-ish here in the uk comes at around 450 quid!
Thanks for the review, looks like quite a nice and fast card.
Regarding the CPU scaling comparison, was the E8600 overclocked? Seems like the C2Duo E8600 flagship is actually bottlenecking the GTX295 even at 1680x1050 with 4x AA :O I'm quite surprised by this.
Is it possible for you guys to do a clock for clock comparison of the i7 to the older Core2quad or duo with this new card? Would be good to see how much the older cpus actually do bottleneck these fast cards.